When Co-Trustees Clash

In a recent Connecticut Supreme Court case, Rutherford v. Slagle, a family trust became the center of a legal battle between two co-trustees, who were also family members. After the death of both parents, the trust was ready to be distributed to the adult children. However, when one trustee believed the assets should be divided equally, and the other challenged that interpretation, the case escalated from the probate court to the state’s highest court.

This case highlights an everyday reality many families face: even with a well-drafted trust, conflict can arise when multiple trustees are involved, particularly if they’re also beneficiaries. Disagreements about what the trust document states can delay distributions, trigger expensive litigation, and strain relationships that may already be fragile due to grief or long-standing family tensions.

When co-trustees can’t agree, trust administration stalls. One trustee might file a petition in probate court to resolve the issue. However, as Rutherford demonstrates, this can lead to appeals, court orders, and years of uncertainty for beneficiaries.

The lesson? Harmony and communication between co-trustees are critical, and not always guaranteed. That’s why many estate planners now recommend appointing a neutral or professional trustee, especially in families where emotions run high or sibling rivalry is well established. A neutral third party can reduce friction, expedite administration, and prevent disputes from reaching the courtroom.

Disclaimer: This blog is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this post does not create an attorney-client relationship. For legal help, consult a licensed attorney.